Skip to content

Maximize Your Mileage

Published: at 10:11 AM

How Engine Power and Transmission Types Affect Gas Mileage

This post utilises data from the CORGIS Dataset - Cars (2009–2012).
Fuel efficiency units are given in miles per gallon (MPG) per the dataset.
Conversion factor: 0.425 MPG ≈ 1 km/l.

Table of contents

Open Table of contents

1. Introduction

Thinking about buying a new vehicle?

You’re probably juggling between getting something that’s fun to drive and something that won’t break the bank at the pump. Fuel efficiency is a crucial factor in this decision. Getting more miles per gallon (MPG) as you drive, can mean fewer gas station stops and less pollution — a win for both you and the planet!

I’ve always thought that powerful engines use more gas and that manual vehicles are better for mileage than automatic ones. But does the data back this up? Let’s take a closer look and find out.

2. Data Exploration and Key Questions

An Overview of the Data

Okay, let’s dive into some numbers. Our dataset features 5,058 unique vehicle combinations, giving us a solid snapshot of various makes, model years, and performance metrics from 2009 to 2012. The timeframe lets us peek into trends over time in fuel efficiency and see how tech advancements might have shaken things up.

The top five brands in the dataset are:

  1. Chevrolet: 624 models
  2. Ford: 594 models
  3. GMC: 366 models
  4. Toyota: 323 models
  5. Nissan: 293 models

Car_Count

A histogram reveals a higher concentration of models closer to 2012, meaning we’ve got a greater number of newer vehicles in the dataset.

Average_MPG_Year

From 2009 to 2012, highway MPG consistently beat city MPG.
Without the stop-and-go of city traffic, highway driving is usually smoother and enhances fuel efficiency.
On average, vehicles in the dataset got about 17 MPG in the city and 24 MPG on the highway.

Key Questions to Explore

The dataset contains information on:

Using the data, we’ll tackle the following questions in the next two sections:

  1. What roles do horsepower and torque play in predicting city and highway MPG?
  2. Can modern automatic transmissions match or exceed manual vehicles in real-world MPG performance?

3. Trade-Off Between Power and Fuel Efficiency?

Horsepower vs Fuel Efficiency

First up, let’s see if more horsepower usually predicts worse fuel efficiency.

City MPG: Scatter_Horsepower_City

There’s a strong negative correlation (r = -0.70) between horsepower and city MPG. Translation - vehicles with higher horsepower tend to use more gas in urban driving conditions.

Highway MPG: Scatter_Horsepower_Highway

The negative relationship between higher horsepower and gas usage also holds for the highway (r = -0.61). However, it is more moderate compared to the urban environment. So, while higher horsepower negatively affects fuel efficiency on the highway too, it may not be as big of a deal as in the city.

Torque vs. Fuel Efficiency

Now let’s talk about torque.

City MPG: Scatter_Torque_City

Torque shows a strong negative correlation with city MPG (r = -0.75). Higher torque means lower fuel efficiency in stop-and-go traffic.

Highway MPG: Scatter_Torque_Highway On the highway, the negative correlation (r = -0.69) holds but is less dramatic than in city driving.

Bottom Line

Power vs. Fuel Efficiency Trade-Off: Higher horsepower and torque will usually mean lower fuel efficiency, especially in city driving where you constantly start-and-stop. On the highway, where you maintain steady speeds, the impact is less severe. So, while there is a trade-off between power and efficiency, the environment where you usually drive in can make a difference.

4. Transmission Type and Fuel Efficiency

Manual vs. Automatic

You’ve probably heard that manual transmissions are more fuel-efficient than auto ones. Is that still true today?

The preliminary analysis says yes. It shows that manual transmissions outperform auto vehicles in both city and highway environments:

Transmission TypeCity MPGHighway MPG
Manual20.2 average
(min: 11, max: 38, stddev: 4.4)
27.9 average
(min: 17, max: 43, stddev: 5.1)
Automatic16.5 average
(min: 8, max: 36, stddev: 4.2)
23.0 average
(min: 11, max: 41, stddev: 5.6)

On average, manual transmissions deliver about 20% higher MPG vs automatic transmissions in both city (+4 MPG) and highway (+5 MPG) conditions.

To see if this gap has persisted over time, we plotted MPG from 2009 to 2012 by transmission type:

Scatter_Transmission_Trend

It showed that manual vehicles consistently beat auto ones every year, and the gap has persisted over time.

Statistical Significance of the Differences

We ran t-tests (assumed normality, robust to unequal variances and sample sizes) to see if the differences were statistically significant:

City MPG:

Highway MPG:

As the p-values are so small, it is statistically significant that manual transmissions offer superior fuel efficiency compared with auto ones across both driving conditions.

Bottom Line

Manual transmissions still hold the edge in fuel efficiency. While auto transmissions are convenient, if you’re looking to save on gas, a manual vehicle might be the way to go.

5. Conclusion

Key Takeaways for Buyers

Our deep dive shows that horsepower, torque, and transmission type have moderate-strong predictive effects on fuel efficiency. So, what does this mean when you’re shopping for your next vehicle?

Acknowledging the Limitations

Choose a Vehicle That Suits Your Lifestyle

Ultimately, choosing the right vehicle is really about finding the balance that works for you. Whether you’re after horsepower, convenience, better gas mileage, or top-notch safety, knowing what you want will help you pick a good match. Since buying a vehicle is a big purchase, take your time to ensure it aligns with both your lifestyle and budget.


Further Reading:


Previous Post
Who Wins NYC’s Baby Names Showdown